News, Thoughts, and Comments
Posts tagged time
Consulting Service – Free and Paid
Nov 16th
It you want to talk with me your welcome to call anytime. Reference the previous most post for all the ways that you can contact me. I am very happy to talk with anyone on the phone, for free, for a limited amount of time. If you are interested in a more in depth consulting service I encourage you to purchase my time. 10 minute consultation are $50, and can be easily purchased through Paypal. If you are interested in onsite consulting service you are welcome to make a free call to me, and we can discuss your interests in depth.
I am willing to come onsite, anywhere for a negotiable service fee. The fee will depend on the locations. Based on my past consulting contracts the minimum consulting fee is $250 per hour for onsite service. I also have two 1200 Series Brown’s Gas electrolyzer, manufacturer by George Wiseman, that are available, and included free, with paid onsite consulting service. I handle all the logistics involved, and will handle all transportation costs as part of the overall consulting fee.
The generators are available for experimentation, demonstration, and anything in between. Just let me know what you have in mind and I will elaborate on the requirements of the field setting. The available generators produce gas at an average efficiency of 3 watthours / liter. With this standard various calculations can be made.
EPA (Environmental Defense) vs. Duke Energy
May 7th
In a supreme court ruling on Apirl 2nd 2007, between the EPA (Environmental Defense) vs. Duke Energy Coal-Fired-Power Plants are being increasingly pressured to comply with EPA emissions standards. EPA vs. Duke Energy. If the status quo of energy companies are just now being pressured to comply with regulations, it is a sign that we are barely at the beginning. The energy companies are truly not even close to being “green” and are by far predominantly focused on profitability, and logistics; essentially their bottom line.There is no straight forward statement that can explain the lack of progress. Specifically with regard to the concept of “fuel enhancement” is is in the best interest of the Energy Companies to utilize the technology. It essentially increases their bottom line, while easing compliance with EPA regulations. It literally kills two birds with one stone. Since the concept of “fuel enhancement” clearly only has positive implications, it is inevitable that Energy Institutions will recognize the viability of “fuel enhancement”.
Time will tell all. Time, time, time…..