News, Thoughts, and Comments
Posts tagged patent
Waterfuel.us waterfuelconverters.com – What it is and Where its Going
Nov 14th
Waterfuelconverters.com also has the domain waterfuel.us. Frankly I created this website years ago, and I wish I could just change the domain name to something more appropriate. I create the website when I was in college writing a patent. The patent is called the Streamlined Electrolyzer. Such a device, it the patent went through, would and could be referenced as a water fuel converter. But the patent was not approved for a variety of reason, and there the website is not representative of the idea I once had. The website has evolved into a consulting business. Therefore a different name would be more appropriate. Maybe waterfuelconsulting.com would be more applicable.
Ultimately it is what it is, and the domain name will remain unchanged. I don’t feel entirely uncomfortable with the name because it is representative of the Streamlined Electrolyzer that I invented in college. Maybe in the future when I have enough money I’ll get the design patented legitimately. As for now the design and utility will remain unpatented for economic reason.
I will keep my website only forever. It is fully self sustaining because the corporation receives money from Google ads, and the hosting account is paid for by the same bank account automatically. It will pay for itself for eternity. This gives me a sense of contentment.
My website is technically perfect. While the content can be debated, the code itself has been crafted to W3C perfection. It is semantically perfect, and its accessibility has been tweaked to relative excellence. Given the attractiveness that I wanted, the advance javascript content does seamless degrade; meaning that if javascript is not enable the website is still viewable. Also if images are no auto loaded, or disable, the website will still appear correct. Also if flash is disable the website will appear correctly. I am very proud of the website as a technical achievement; this is clearly independent of the business entity itself.
Wikipedia Battle
Jun 11th
There is an ongoing battle over at Wikipedia dealing with Brown’s Gas and HHO. It is understandable that an Encyclopedia should only have academic or third party sources that can be cited, and its a shame that many of the more legitimate of sources are inaccurate, imprecise, or blatantly incorrect. All news sources, meaning television broadcasts, are basically useless and detrimentally inaccurate. Even the HHO patent is manipulative in that it tries to establish a differences between HHO and Brown’s Gas without making a side-by-side comparison.
Since everyone is relying on the HHO patent for information about the gas, and there is no academic publications about the connection of HHO to Brown’s Gas, Wikipedia assumes that HHO somehow is a different gas than Brown’s Gas. And since Brown’s Gas is grossly misunderstood by the editors at Wikipedia, and is considered even being remotely related to Oxy-Hydrogen, there is a spiders web of a mess that is shamefully unhelpful.
What the general public needs is a prominent third party sources that states that HHO is a brand name of Brown’s Gas, and that the HHO patent contains data that represents the production method and chemical makeup of Brown’s Gas.